Exhibit 1.01

Akoustis Technologies, Inc.

Conflict Minerals Report

For The Calendar Year Ended December 31, 2022

This Conflict Minerals Report (this “Report”) of Akoustis Technologies, Inc. for the calendar year ended December 31, 2022 (the “Reporting Period”) is filed in accordance with Rule 13p-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Rule”), and pursuant to the Company’s Specialized Disclosure Report on Form SD (“Form SD”) for the Reporting Period filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). The Rule imposes certain reporting and disclosure obligations on SEC registrants for which cassiterite, columbite-tantalite, gold, wolframite, or their derivatives, which are limited to tin, tantalum and tungsten (“conflict minerals”) are necessary to the functionality or production of a product manufactured, or contracted to be manufactured, by the registrant.

References in this Report to “Akoustis,” “the Company,” “we,” “our,” or “us” refer to Akoustis Technologies, Inc. and its subsidiary, Akoustis, Inc., on a consolidated basis, unless otherwise indicated or the context otherwise requires. In accordance with Instruction 3 to Item 1.01 of Form SD, this Report does not include products manufactured or contracted for manufacture by businesses that had not been obligated to provide a specialized disclosure report with respect to conflict minerals and were acquired by us on or after May 1, 2021.

Company and Product Overview

Akoustis® is an emerging commercial product company focused on developing, designing, and manufacturing innovative radio filter (“RF”) filter solutions for the wireless industry, including for products such as smartphones and tablets, network infrastructure equipment, Wi-Fi Customer Premise Equipment (“CPE”) and defense applications. Filters are critical in selecting and rejecting signals, and their performance enables differentiation in the modules defining the RF front-end (“RFFE”). Located between the device’s antenna and its digital backend, the RFFE is the circuitry that performs the analog signal processing and contains components such as amplifiers, filters and switches. We have developed a proprietary microelectromechanical system (“MEMS”) based bulk acoustic wave (“BAW”) technology and a unique manufacturing process flow, called “XBAW^®”, for our filters produced for use in RFFE modules. Our XBAW^® filters incorporate optimized high purity piezoelectric materials for high power, high frequency and wide bandwidth operation. We are developing RF filters for 5G, Wi-Fi and defense bands using our proprietary resonator device models and product design kits (PDKs). As we qualify our RF filter products, we are engaging with target customers to evaluate our filter solutions. Our initial designs target UHB, sub 7 GHz 5G, Wi-Fi and defense bands. We expect our filter solutions will address problems (such as loss, bandwidth, power handling, and isolation) created by the growing number of frequency bands in the RFFE of mobile devices, infrastructure and premise equipment to support 5G, and Wi-Fi. We have prototyped, sampled and begun commercial shipment of our single-band low loss BAW filter designs for 5G frequency bands and 5 GHz and 6 GHz Wi-Fi bands which are suited to competitive BAW solutions and historically cannot be addressed with low-band, lower power handling surface acoustic wave (“SAW”) technology. Additionally, through our wholly owned subsidiary, RFMi, which we acquired majority ownership in October 2021 and full ownership in April 2022, we operate a fabless business whereby we make sales of complementary SAW resonators, RF filters, crystal (“Xtal”) resonators and oscillators, and ceramic products—addressing opportunities in multiple end markets, such as automotive and industrial applications. We also offer back-end semiconductor supply chain services through our wholly owned subsidiary, Grinding & Dicing Services, Inc., which we acquired in January 2023.

Design of Conflict Minerals Program

Akoustis’ due diligence framework with regards to conflict minerals, which is summarized below, is designed to conform with the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (“OECD”) Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains for Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High Risk Areas, and the Supplements on Tin, Tantalum and Tungsten and on Gold.

Step 1- Strong company management systems

Step 2- Identify and assess risks in the supply chain

Step 3- Maintain a strategy to respond to identified risks

Step 4- Independent third-party audit of SORs’ due diligence practices

Step 5- Report annually on supply chain due diligence

Description of Due Diligence Measures Performed

Results of Our Due Diligence Measures

Akoustis uses tin, tantalum, tungsten and gold (“3TG”) in the design and manufacture of certain of its products and is therefore a “downstream” company in the conflict minerals supply chain. Due to the nature of our supply chain, we do not typically have a direct relationship with 3TG SORs. Our manufacturing operations employ a wide variety of semiconductors, electromechanical components and raw materials that are also supplied by other downstream companies in the supply chain. Our due diligence process involves seeking data from our relevant suppliers, and these suppliers seeking similar information from their supply chain in order to identify the sources for the necessary conflict minerals. We rely on the good faith efforts of our supply chain to provide us with reasonable data. We also depend largely on information collected and provided by RMI obtained through its independent third-party audit programs, such as RMAP. We achieved a response rate of 100% for our supply chain survey.

Many of our suppliers sourced 3TG from a variety of upstream sources and provided information to us on an aggregated, company-wide level. Due to the fungible nature of these materials, we understand that these suppliers were unable to trace the 3TG that they source into the products provided to any particular customer (including Akoustis). As a result, our list of SORs may contain more facilities than are actually used in our supply chain.

We compare SORs declared by our suppliers against the list of facilities that are conformant with the RMAP’s standards for responsible mineral procurement and obtain countries of origin information (when available) from RMI. Our due diligence measures identified 47 SORs determined to be legitimate processing facilities by the RMI, all of which have been validated as RMAP conformant.

As reported to us by our relevant suppliers, we have included a list of SORs determined to be legitimate processing facilities by the RMI and the locations of these facilities in Table 1 below.

As previously noted, because of the nature of our supply chain, we do not typically have any direct relationship with 3TG SORs. Therefore, as noted above, we contributed to the improvement of SOR diligence practices by working through our supply chain and RMI.

Ongoing Improvement Efforts

For the next reporting period, we intend to continue taking steps to mitigate the risk that conflict minerals that are necessary to the functionality or production of our products finance or benefit armed groups in the Covered Countries.

These steps may include:

Table of Conflict Minerals Processing Smelters or Refiners

Set forth in the table below is a list of the 47 SORs identified by our suppliers as possibly being used to process 3TG. RMAP statuses set forth in the lists below are based on information provided by RMI as of May 1, 2022. Our efforts to determine the mine or location of origin of our necessary conflict minerals are set forth above in “Description of Due Diligence Measures Performed” and “Results of Our Due Diligence Measures”.

Table 1: Smelters and Refiners

4